The first operation when unwinding a coil is straightening to ensure flatness before further processing. There are two main types of equipment used to create a flat coil – a straightener and a precision leveller. In some respects, these two types of equipment are similar, but a precision leveller has additional capabilities.
Straighteners – All coils must be wound under tension to avoid “soft” or collapsed coils. As a result, tension and compression stresses are induced into the strip during the coiling process, and these can contribute to blank or part distortion in subsequent processes. Straighteners are designed to eliminate these stresses and create flat material; the objective is to relieve the residual stresses in the outer 20% of the strip.
Straightening of coils is accomplished by bending the strip around a set of rolls to alternately stretch and compress the upper and lower surfaces of the steel to erase coil set or crossbow. Critical parameters include roll diameter, roll spacing, backup roll configuration, roll material type, gear design, overall system rigidity, and power requirements. The higher the material’s yield strength, the greater the force that’s required to relieve those residual stresses. Thus, equipment capability needs to be considered when processing AHSS products. Figure 1 shows a schematic of a straightener working the outer 20% of the steel strip. Figure 2 depicts coil set and crossbow conditions.
Figure 1: Schematic of a straightener roll working the outer 20% of the steel strip. 1
Figure 2: Schematic of a coil with a coil set and crossbow conditions, that can be removed with a straightener. 1
When utilizing a straightener, the two critical steel variables that impact the process are the yield strength and the thickness. Straighteners have a series of rolls that progressively flex the strip to remove the residual stresses. These rolls have an entry and exit gap that need to be adjusted when thickness and yield strengths vary.
Figure 3 shows a schematic of a typical set of straightener rolls required to obtain a flat strip. These gaps should be adjusted based on the yield strength and thickness of the material. Many equipment manufacturers have generated tables to guide the operator as to the best settings for various yield strength-thickness combinations.1
Figure 3: Schematic of a set of straightener rolls indicating the two main adjustments – entry and exit gaps. 1
Precision Levellers – Although precision levellers can perform all the functions of a straightener, they have additional capabilities. They can remove coil set and crossbow conditions and are capable of correcting other shape issues in coils that can create manufacturing problems in subsequent operations, for example, edge waves and center buckles.
Correcting edge waves and distortion requires exceeding the yield strength of the steel strip at levels of 50% or more of the cross section of the strip; this may increase the potential for work hardening the steel strip, negatively affecting formability. Figure 4 shows a schematic of a precision levelling roll working 50% of the cross section of the steel strip, which is the typical process for removing edge waves and center buckles.
Figure 4: Schematic of a precision leveller roll working the outer 50% portion of a steel strip. 1
Design and Processing Implications
The progressively higher yield strengths for AHSS are challenging the capabilities of straighteners and precision levellers that were not designed for flattening these high strength materials. Equipment manufacturers have been studying and developing solutions to address this issue. There are a series of components related to the design of straighteners and precision levellers that need to be considered:
Roll Diameter – Straightener rolls for AHSS generally may need to be smaller in diameter than those used for mild steel, providing a smaller radius around which to bend the material. This is because AHSS must be bent more severely to exceed its higher yield strength.
Roll Spacing – Work roll center-spacing may need to be closer for AHSS than for comparable mild steels. Closer spacing means that more force is required to back-bend the material, requiring greater power for processing.
Roll Support – Larger journal diameters with larger radii and bearing capacity may be needed to withstand the greater forces and higher power required to straighten AHSS.
1 Courtesy of Peter Mooney, 3S-Superior Stamping Solutions, LLC
AHSS applications are growing, where the high strength body components help meet crash requirements, and thinner sections achieve weight reduction for improved fuel economy and lower overall emissions. Both higher strength and thickness reduction contribute to lower overall formability, higher forces, greater temperatures and accelerated die wear, and each of these outcomes reduce the size of the manufacturing window. To manage all of these challenges, the pressroom must implement advanced process control measures in order to minimize normal process variation, as the process is now less tolerant of this variation. The same holds true for die and recipe maintenance.
Understanding this reality, it’s important to make process decisions that enhance the forming window. This includes better die materials, surface treatments, surface coatings and data-based lubricant specification. Cross-functional communication is required to create awareness among employees in the level of process discipline critical to success. Controlling the inputs of the stamping process become vital to achieving predictable outputs, therefore process recipes should be defined and fixed across all shifts. This is the spirit behind process control, which defines the relationship between key inputs and outputs of the stamping process. Figure 1 shows critical stamping inputs, such as the steel, lubricant, press and die conditions. All of these contribute to final part outputs, and thus need to well-documented, maintained and understood for process reliability and repeatability.
Figure 1: Stamping pressroom critical inputs including the steel, lubricant, press and die.
Reference Panels are ideal for AHSS processes, and effectively establish process control of the forming operation. A reference panel is a draw shell that documents input settings and process outputs (forming strains, draw-in lines, trim scrap) at the time the panel was formed. It thus serves as a useful reference for each die-set, to compare to the current operational panel and process, ensuring that all inputs are stable. Visual changes in panel appearance or measured changes in strains or draw-in lines allow rapid detection of input variation, and process adjustments to be incorporated prior to incurring unacceptable panels (characterized by scoring, distortion, buckles or splits).
The use of reference panels should be part of a Formability System, characterized by systematic panel reviews, recipe confirmations, and die improvement / die maintenance planning. As an example, production realities are such that reference panels won’t be used if they are not stored in a protective rack, near the floor (so access is easy). Figure 2 shows an example reference panel rack system in a North American stamping plant.
Figure 2: Door Outer Reference Panel and Storage Rack.
All affected employees need to be trained on the importance of this tool, so panels are preserved and not discarded during housekeeping events. And a disciplined panel review process aligns production and trade personnel to ensure that the reference panels are used during each part run. Draw-in or thickness templates allow for formability measures on panels in very precise and consistent locations. Measuring these outputs on a regular basis (every part run) enables a determination of process stability and trends, which becomes important towards scheduling PM. Examples of draw-in templates are shown below in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Draw-in template for draw panel; cutout allows for accurate, repeatable measurement.
Because AHSS products are susceptible to edge shearing from trim and pierce operations, these operations require advanced tooling and more frequent PM intervals. All die maintenance will be critical, requiring more frequent polishing, insert replacement (or reconditioning), surface treatment assessments to plan repair or reapplication, etc. Finally, tool and die personnel should attempt to define the size of the forming window with split-buckle analysis, varying shut height while maintaining all other variables constant to determine when unacceptable buckles or necking initiate. This information is then used to develop input (recipe) settings that achieve production stability and robustness.
To understand the difference between localized and global fractures, you must first understand strain gradients (see the article in our blog, AHSS Strain Hardening and Gradients). Gradients can result in highly concentrated strains (peak strain condition) that typically occurs in an embossment or character line where the deformation mode is in plane strain. Peak strains can develop rapidly in a very localized area (Figure 1). Under additional loads, this can result in the onset of localized necking, which means the material has reached its tensile strength and will fail at its weakest point or highest strain. When a slight increase in strain is applied, the material will fracture, sometimes at deformation levels less than predicted. This condition can be found in AHSS products, where multiple phases exist within the steel’s microstructure, each with different properties. A global fracture also typically occurs in plane strain, but more commonly down a sidewall or other area with more moderate geometry complexity.
Figure 1: Peak strain in the localized area or embossment
Peak (concentrated) strains are susceptible to localized fractures when even slight variation exists in the forming process. Examples of variation include lubrication pattern and volume, die recipe including blank position, press conditions, and material characteristics.
A localized neck and/or fracture (Figure 2) reduces the sheet metal’s thickness, reducing part strength, and compromising functional performance such as fatigue life, crash worthiness, and stamping stiffness. There are a number of formability analysis tools that can differentiate localized and global fractures and enable die makers to implement die and process improvements that minimize fracture susceptibility. The result is a more robust stamping process.
Figure 2: Schematic of Localized Necking and Fracture
Process control is critical; die recipe discipline is needed to minimize tinkering with die recipe, press settings, and lubrication settings. Mechanical properties of the sheet metal should be tracked to identify trends or variations in the material, and establish the material forming window. Typical mechanical properties that are available from the steel supplier are yield strength, tensile strength, n-value, total and uniformed elongation, and sheet thickness. Additional properties that should be determined include hole expansion and deep cup draw ratios. Failure to identify strain levels, process variables and variation will lead to a reactionary approach to controlling the output. This will lead to an increase in scrap, die-related downtime, and of course, costs.
Contributions made by Phoenix Group.
Compensating for material springback during the forming process can be challenging. During forming, stress is applied to the material making it conform to the die geometry. The material will strain or displace across the die geometry, which consists of complex shapes, creating numerous strain patterns throughout the part. These multiple strain patterns trap residual stresses within the sheet metal, resulting in distortion and springback once the forces are released.
New Advanced High-Strength Steels are characterized by yield strengths several times that of typical mild steels. They require higher forming forces to reach the “yield” strength, allowing permanent deformation to occur in the shape of the die. Modifications to die geometry or process parameters are required to correctly compensate for these residual stresses, otherwise the stamping facility will battle repeatability issues, which results in scrap or tool and die downtime. Typical reaction to this variation is to ask for tolerances to be increased and forcing operations further downstream to address these issues. The use of part stiffening beads, stake beads, and die geometry compensation will help to correct springback issues.
Strategically placing geometric shapes along flange walls, flange angles and sidewalls can lock in residual stresses, reducing the angular changes or twist created by springback. These geometric changes must be approved through product design. Commonly used shapes are darts, beads, step flanges and offsets.
Figure 1: Step flanges, stiffening beads and offsets can help control springback in AHSS.
Step flanges (example 1) can be added to flange walls to compensate for angular changes due to springback. The added stiffness created by the part geometry locks in the residual stress, which would create a curl or twist in the flange. Stiffening darts (example 2) are also used to reduce the angular changes in sidewalls or flanges. Adding an offset (example 3) horizontally along a wall will reduce twist and add stiffness to the part and creating higher strain patterns, which are introduced at the bottom of the forming cycle.
The use of stake beads when forming Advanced High-Strength Steel is a common practice to manage the stamping’s residual stresses. The stake beads are added to the part addendum and come into play at the bottom of the stroke, resulting in increased sidewall strain; the effect is to lock in the plastic deformation, reducing the curl and angular change in the sidewall. Figure 2 illustrates an open hat section with and without stake beads.
Figure 2: Stake beads to minimize sidewall curl and angularity.
Training die makers to understand springback associated with Advanced High-Strength Steel, and how to manage springback through proven countermeasures enables more consistent stamping performance. The AHSS Application Guidelines Version 6.0 has a great deal of information on this topic. Section 3.C.3 (starting on Page 3-53) is devoted to Springback Management, addressing it in depth. If you haven’t already downloaded a copy, it is available free of charge at worldautosteel.org
And be sure to ask your questions here!
Contributions made by Phoenix Group.
Every stamped part has springback. When sheet metal is plastically deformed into a part, the shape of the part always deviates somewhat from the shape of the punch and die after removal from the tooling. This dimensional deviation of the part is known as springback. Springback is caused by elastic recovery of the part, which can be illustrated simply on the stress-strain curves shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Schematic showing amount of springback is proportional to stress.
Unloading (by removing all external forces and moments) from the plastic deformation level A would follow line AB to B, where OB is the permanent deformation (plastic) and BC is the recovered deformation (elastic). Although this elastic recovered deformation at a given location is very small, it can cause significant shape change due to its mechanical multiplying effect on other locations when bending deformation and/or curved surfaces are involved.
In general, springback experienced in AHSS parts is greater than that experienced in mild or conventional HSLA steels, due in large part to the progressively higher initial yield strengths and the greater work hardening rate that significantly increases the yield strength during forming. In fact, springback for higher yield strength materials can be up to eight times that of traditional mild steels, as shown below in Figure 2.
Figure 2 – Springback angles for various steels.
The magnitude of springback is governed by the tooling and component geometry. When part geometry prevents complete unloading (relaxing) of the elastic stresses, the elastic stresses remaining in the part are called residual stresses. The part then will assume whatever shape it can to minimize the total remaining residual stresses. Creating a uniformly distributed residual stress pattern across the sheet and through the thickness will help eliminate the source of mechanical multiplier effects and thus lead to reduced springback problems.
Three common forms of springback are angular change, sidewall curl, and twist. Angular change is the angle created when the bending edge line (the formed part) deviates from the line of the tool. Sidewall curl is the curvature created in the side wall of a channel when sheet metal is drawn over a die/punch radius or through a draw bead. The primary cause is uneven stress distribution through the thickness of the sheet metal, generated during the bending and unbending process. Twist is caused by torsion moments in the cross-section of the part, developing because of unbalanced springback and residual stresses acting in the part to create a force couple, which tends to rotate one end of the part relative to another.
Die designers have engineered the dies to compensate for springback, and developed many effective countermeasures. They have applied the appropriate amount of restraining force to deform the material and configured the die geometry to lock in the plastic deformation that the material needs to form a quality panel. In the stamping operation, however, process variation can affect the forces applied to the material, resulting in unexpected springback, nonconforming parts, and potential fit-up issues during the assembly process. For these reasons, tool and die countermeasures and enhanced process recipe discipline are required for effective AHSS stamping productivity and quality.
BONUS! Dr. Stuart Keeler is a well-known name in the world of Metallurgy, having created the Forming Limit Diagram used widely today. Watch as Dr. Keeler talks about the origins of springback.
Dr. Stuart Keeler On Springback from worldautosteel on Vimeo.
A common problem in every stamping plant is trim edge burrs. As new materials have been introduced, special trim breakage (clearance) or entry amounts may be required. Researchers are still trying to understand the edge stretching limits of these new materials. Edge stretching limits are directly linked to the reduction of the work hardening exponent (n-value) due to the cutting operation. As the material is cut during the coil slitting, blanking, trimming, or piercing operations, the tensile stretching on the sheared edge reduces the amount of formability remaining in the material. Finding the proper trim breakage and trim edge condition is critical. New test studies help steel producers understand the maximum stretch limits of the material they produce.
The Hole Expansion Test (HET) is the accepted form of measuring edge stretching limits. The test is performed by punching a hole in the center of a flat blank which is then clamped down, while a conical punch is pushed up through the hole, creating a stretch-flanged edge (see Figures 1 & 2). The output is the ratio of final hole diameter/initial hole diameter. The hole in the blank can be produced by various processes, to simulate manufacturing conditions. Some of the best results are produced by utilizing milled edges, laser cutting, EDM, and water jet.
In the world of stamping operations, reduced formability of a trim or pierced edge can equate to downtime, scrap, or rework. Since the use of EDM and Waterjets are not practical solutions, we evaluate current methods and materials that are available. The intention is to provide information to the people on the shop floor who might deal with this issue on any given day. Worn or chipped trim steels, improper clearances, and worn punches need to be repaired and maintained. New Advanced High-Strength Steels have lower forming limits compared to mild steel, and the introduction of a worn tool will reduce that forming range significantly. The use of powder metallurgy or cutting steels can help improve the number of hits between preventive maintenance intervals significantly. Some surface treatments can also extend tool life, achieving the same relative tool wear as conventional mild steels.
Figure 1: Schematic of a typical hole expansion test (HET)
conical punch/die setup.
Figure 2: Schematic showing hole expansion capability for a 200 MPa mild steel for various punch conditions.
New grades such as Complex Phase (CP) steels have great strength, but also perform well in edge or stretch flange conditions because of bainite and grain refinement due to thermo-mechanical processing in the steel mill. Yet, the lack of proper tool maintenance can strip these steels of their performance advantage, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Hole expansion results for various AHSS grades, comparing effect of tool conditions.
Understanding the effects of tool wear rates, trim breakage, surface coating, and surface treatments will reduce downtime, scrap, and extend preventive maintenance intervals on trim and pierce dies. Providing training to the die makers on the newest materials, die components, and surface treatments available will help them make longer lasting corrections to stamping dies. Research and processes are evolving every day, resulting in new methods, products, and information for the successful stamping of Advanced High-Strength Steels.
Note: AHSS Application Guidelines Section 3.C.2 – Tool Materials and Die Wear contains more information that you may find helpful. Download the Guidelines free at www.worldautosteel.org.
- Figure 1: (Schematic): H. Mohrbacher, “Advanced metallurgical concepts for DP steels with improved formability and damage resistance” – NiobelCon bvba
- Figure 2: R. Hilsen et al, “Stamping Potential of Hot-Rolled, Columbium-Bearing High-Strength Steels,” Proceedings of Microalloying 75 (1977).
- Figure 3: Courtesy of C. Walch, voestalpine Stahl GmbH.
Contributions made by Phoenix Group.